Coal Emissions Impact Prenatal Health
I’m no expert on matters automotive, but it seems to me coal power is kinda like one of those old Fiats: by the time you’ve fixed one part, another has already broken. From the Columbia Center for Children’s Environmental Health comes word of the latest breakdown from the cost-convenient-but-ecologically-devestating fossil fuel: coal emissions make your kids dumb.
From clouds of carcinogenic soot, to sulfate and nitrate emissions that create acid rain, to mercury dispersal that nearly quadruples the potential environmental damage from compact fluorescent bulbs, to the particulate emissions that gave Pittsburgh the worst air in America, coal has always managed to evade being a useful, clean energy source—and that’s even assuming that a viable carbon sequestration method can be found.
Its low cost and ready availability make coal too potentially useful a resource to not consider fully, but according the best available science, there’s simply no way to employ it as a sustainable energy solution.
Share This Story
Related Entries
- NH 'Green Slopes' To Mitigate Skiers' Impact - August 27, 2008
- Fueling Florida's Sustainable Future - August 29, 2008
- The $25 Gridless, Fuelless Fridge - July 8, 2008
- Nuclear Comeback Splits Green Energy Advocates - March 31, 2008
- Portugal Goes Electric - July 12, 2008
Read More Articles »

bookmark on del.icio.us
digg this story
submit to reddit
submit to newsvine
bookmark on furl
add to blinklist
Done properly, gasified coal can have a lower footprint than a natural gas combined cycle power plant (in terms of conventional pollutants), and can capture the carbon.
The "done properly" is the critical part of that sentence.
Oh, and you dont have to "assume" about a viable method of carbon capture and sequestration. It is being done now. The Weyburn project in Canada, in combination with the Great Plains gasification facility in North Dakota, has been doing it since 2000. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_capture_and_storage#Example_CCS_projects